Optometry Research - Myopia, Optometric Practice, Therapy

Optometry Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Optometry, including details on myopia, optometric practice, therapy.


Optometry Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Optometry

Books on Optometry

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry.

Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R

School of Optometry, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the iCARE rebound tonometer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-five eyes of 125 normal healthy subjects. METHODS: Intraocular pressure was determined in all subjects using the iCARE at both central and temporal corneal regions. Corneal thickness at these 2 regions was determined by ultrasonic pachymetry. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were measured using an ocular response analyzer. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) was also performed on all eyes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, and corneal resistance factor. RESULTS: Although the peripheral cornea was significantly thicker than the central cornea, IOPs obtained by the iCARE at the 2 regions were similar and significantly higher than GAT measurements. There were an overestimation at higher IOPs and an underestimation at lower IOPs relative to GAT measurements. Multiple regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the iCARE and CH (partial correlation r = -0.67, P<0.01) and CRF (partial correlation r = 0.82, P<0.01). The correlation between the iCARE and central corneal thickness was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Rebound tonometry is affected by corneal properties including CH and CRF but not corneal thickness.

Published 1 January 2008 in Ophthalmology, 115(1): 80-4.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Optometry Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Optometry Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Optometry Books

Retina e-dition: Text with Continually Updated Online Reference, 3-Volume Set

Retina e-dition: Text with Continually Updated Online Reference, 3-Volume Set