Optometry Research - Myopia, Optometric Practice, Therapy

Optometry Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Optometry, including details on myopia, optometric practice, therapy.


Optometry Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Optometry

Books on Optometry

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Central versus paracentral endothelial cell density values in relation to duration of soft contact lens wear.

Doughty MJ, Aakre BM

From the Department of Vision Sciences (M.J.D.), Glasgow-Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom; and the Department of Optometry and Visual Science (B.M.A.), Buskerud University College, Kongsburg, Norway.

PURPOSE.: To assess whether the difference between midperipheral (paracentral) cell density (MPCD) and central cell density (CCD) values of the corneal endothelium could be related to the duration of soft contact lens wear. METHODS.: A cross-sectional, retrospective review of the endothelial images of 104 subjects who were between the ages of 20 and 41 years, were myopes (-0.725 to -7.625 spherical diopters), and had a history of 1 to 23 years of uninterrupted soft contact lens wear. Images were taken with a noncontact specular microscope (Topcon SP2000-P) at the central location and at a midperipheral location (i.e., 3 mm from the optical axis). The areas of 100 contiguous cells were measured with IMAGEnet software, and endothelial cell density values were calculated. RESULTS.: The mean CCD value was 2,747 cells/mm, and the mean MPCD was 2,954 cells/mm, with the net ratio of MPCD-to-CCD values being 1.0768:1 (P<0.001). The ratio of the MPCD:CCD values, expressed as a percentage, could be correlated to the years of soft contact lens wear, with a linear regression analysis indicating a modest but statistically significant effect (P = 0.008, r = 0.257). CONCLUSIONS.: In morphometry of the corneal endothelium away from central sites, the history of contact lens wear must be considered.

Published 16 July 2007 in Eye Contact Lens, 33(4): 180-4.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Optometry Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Optometry Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)



Optometry Books

How to Improve Your Child's Eyesight Naturally: A Thoughtful Parent's Guide

How to Improve Your Child's Eyesight Naturally: A Thoughtful Parent's Guide