Optometry Research - Myopia, Optometric Practice, Therapy

Optometry Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Optometry, including details on myopia, optometric practice, therapy.


Optometry Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Optometry

Books on Optometry

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Optometrist referrals for cataract and "Action on Cataracts" guidelines: are optometrists following them and are they effective?

Lash SC, Prendiville CP, Samson A, Lewis K, Munneke R, Parkin BT

The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, UK. stevelash@doctors.org.uk

PURPOSE: To assess the information included in optometrist referrals for cataract to the Hospital Eye Service with reference to the recommendations made by the Department of Health in "Action on Cataracts" and the resultant surgical listing rates. METHODS: We prospectively collected and analysed the information included in three different types of optometrist referrals for cataract over 8 weeks. Referrals containing "full information" as recommended in "Action on Cataracts" confirmed cataract as the cause of visual loss with a detrimental effect on the patient's lifestyle, and a willingness for surgery. The referral outcomes were assessed in terms of listing rate and the reasons for not listing, for each type of referral form. RESULTS: A total of 412 referrals were analysed. Of these, 50% (208) were "conventional" referrals via the general practitioner (GP) [39% (n = 162) using the General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) 18 referral form and 11% (n = 46) an optometrist's custom letter]; 35% (n = 143) were direct referrals and 15% (n = 61) were GP referrals with no optometrist information (these results were excluded from further analysis). The listing rates for optometric referrals were 78% (n = 272) overall, 83% (n = 119) for direct and 74% (n = 153) for conventional referrals. "Full information" was included in 17% (n = 8) of letter referrals and 10% (n = 16) of GOS 18 referrals. The listing rates were 83% for referrals with full information and 73% for referrals specifying only that cataracts were the cause of visual loss. The listing rates for referrals with partial information were 78% for "cataract" plus "effect on lifestyle" and 67% for "cataract" plus "willingness for surgery". The most common reason for not listing a patient for surgery was "no effect on lifestyle", accounting for 42% (n = 32). CONCLUSION: We recommend that all referrals for cataract should confirm a detrimental effect on lifestyle and the patient's willingness for surgery, in addition to confirming cataract as the main cause of visual loss.

Published 21 August 2006 in Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 26(5): 464-7.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Optometry Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Optometry Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)



Optometry Books

How to Improve Your Child's Eyesight Naturally: A Thoughtful Parent's Guide

How to Improve Your Child's Eyesight Naturally: A Thoughtful Parent's Guide